229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif
 

The   economists   have   changed   Marx,   in  various  ways;  the  point  is  to  interpret  him
— correctly.

 

229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif229 -- devil emoticon.gif

 

The 1st Thesis on Marxian Economics (above) is featured, in Portuguese!, on the www.comunistas.info website: "Os economistas passam o tempo a modificar Marx, de diversos modos; a questão é interpretá-lo -- correctamente."

____________________________________________________________________

 

My new book

 

Reclaiming Marx's "Capital"

 

rmc cover good.gif



A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency


 
is now in print!

 

Publisher's online price: $22.91.

 

Click on link for additional information. 

 

 *          *          *

"For over a hundred years, mainstream economists have argued that Marx's labour theory of value cannot handle the relation between value and price, and that Marx's theory is 'internally contradictory' on this basis. However, I've been reading Andrew Kliman's latest book "Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital': A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency" which once and for all refutesthese crass claims. 

"Check out Kliman! It's not an easy read, but I think that it constitues a tremendously powerful refutation of all those smart ass economist dude arguments that 'Marx is inconsistent', and therefore not worth studying."    

-- Glenn Rikowski, educational theorist, on MySpace, July 26, 2007

 *          *          *

 

"My chief inspiration here is the Cambridge-Italian economist Piero Sraffa ....  I was impressed with Kliman's refutation of the Okishio theorem. I didn't think that was possible, and I couldn't see any mistakes in his refutation."

-- Robert Vienneau, Thoughts on Economics (lead blog article and article of April 25, 2007)

 

 *          *          *


London Book Launch:  A book launch for Reclaiming Marx's "Capital" took place on July 11, 2007 at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London.  Speakers included Michael Roberts, columnist at marxist.com; Alan Freeman, co-editor, Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics; Martin Graham, member, Economic Committee of the Communist Party of Britain; Chris Harman, editor, International Socialism journal; and Andrew Kliman.  David Black, author of Helen MacFarlane, chaired.


There are Audio Recordings of all of the talks, as well as comments and questions from the audience and speakers' responses.

Media Coverage of Book Launch:
* "Culture Wars" (reviews website of the Institute of Ideas)
* "21st Century Socialism" website

 

REVIEWS OF RECLAIMING MARX'S "CAPITAL"
The following reviews are available online:
* review by Michael Roberts at marxist.com website
* review by Joseph Choonara, International Socialism journal,
* brief review in Labour Research

 

____________________________________________________________________


June 13, 2006:

See the New, Expanded, Stop Character Assassination page!

 

Owing to an agreement with the character assassin (Jerry _42561167_turkey_66x66getty.jpg Levy), I removed the original Stop Character Assassination page shortly after its creation last month. But -- true to form -- he promptly violated the agreement, so it is back online, and expanded. See details inside.

 

May 22 is Victory for Pluralism Day!

Levy is not feeling very good today. The activity is disheartening to him.

____________________________________________________________________

 

Free, to 1st 50 takers!! My “Screpanti vs. Marx on Exploitation: A comment.” This short paper has just been published in the Review of Political Economy, 18:2, pp. 265-69, April 2006. I expose the latest false claim to have "proved" that Marx's value theory is logically inconsistent, a claim which is the lynchpin of the physicalists' campaign to suppress Marx's critique of political economy in its original form. Please let me know if you would like a copy of this comment as it appears in the journal. The publisher has sent me an "e-print" (pdf file), which I can distribute to the 1st 50 people who ask.